Article 126. The conjugal partnership terminates
1.
Upon the
death of either spouse
2.
When there is
a decree of legal separation
3.
When the
marriage is annulled or declared void, or
4.
In case of
judicial separation of property during the marriage under Articles 134 to 138.
(175a)
According to the conjugal partnership of gains regime,
the couple’s properties will be like this:
1.
Properties
acquired by the husband before he got married shall be exclusively his, the
same way that the wife’s will be hers.
2.
However, when
they get married their exclusive properties shall be joined as part of a one
estate within the conjugal property and the “fruits” of those properties shall
be shared for the duration of the marriage. In addition, any property acquired
during their marriage shall be considered part of this and equally owned by the
husband and wife.
3.
Should the
marriage end and the couple decide to file for legal separation or annulment,
the husband’s exclusive properties he acquired before marriage, including their
“fruits,” will be taken out of the joined estate and once again will be solely
owned by him. The same applies to the wife’s exclusive properties.
4.
The
properties acquired by both or any of the spouses during their marriage shall
be considered part of their conjugal property and will be split in half.
However, if a couple was married on August 3, 1988, up to
present, their properties will no longer be governed by the law of conjugal
property but instead Absolute Community of Property is applied, where any property
purchased and/or built by a husband when still single, is eventually also owned
by his wife upon marriage.
EFFECTS ON THE DEATH OF EITHER SPOUSE
It must be emphasized that the conjugal partnership shall
be terminated upon the death of either spouse. In such case, the following
rules shall be observed.
ART. 103. Upon
the termination of the marriage by death, the community property shall be
liquidated in the same proceeding for the settlement of the estate of the
deceased.
If there is no judicial settlement, within one year from
the death of the deceased spouse the surviving spouse shall liquidate the
community property either judicially or extra- judicially. If there is no
liquidation made upon the lapse of one-year period, any disposition or
encumbrance involving the community property of the terminated marriage shall
be void.
EFFECTS OF LEGAL SEPARATION
One of the effects of the granting of a petition for
legal separation is the dissolution of the conjugal partnership. Thus Article
63 and 64 of the Family Code lay down the rules as:
“Art. 63. The
decree of legal separation shall have the following effects:
(2) The absolute community or the conjugal partnership
shall be dissolve or liquidated but the offending spouse shall have no right to
any share of the net profits earned by the absolute community or the conjugal
partnership, which shall be forfeited in accordance with the provision of
Article 43(2).”
Under Article 43(2) of the Family Code, the termination
of a subsequent marriage where there was absence of one spouse shall produce
the following effect:
“(2) The absolute community of property or the conjugal
partnership, as the case may be, shall be dissolved and liquidated, but if
either spouse contracted said marriage in bad faith, his or her share of the
net profits of the community property or conjugal partnership property shall be
forfeited in favor of the common children or, if there are none, the children
of the guilty spouse by a previous marriage or in default of children, the
innocent spouse.”
Furthermore, Article 64 of the Family Code provides
“Art. 64. After the finality of the decree of
legal separation, the innocent spouse may revoke the donations made -by him or
by her in favor of the offending spouse, as well as the designation of the latter
as beneficiary in any insurance policy, even if such designation be stipulated as irrevocable. The revocation of
the donations shall be recorded in the registries of property in the places
where the properties are located. Alienations, lien and encumbrances registered
in good faith before the recording of the complaint for revocation in the
registries of property shall be respected. The revocation of or change in the
designation of the insurance beneficiary shall take effect upon written
notification thereof the insured.
The action to revoke the donation under this Article must
be brought within five years from the time the decree of legal separation has
become final (107a)”
EFFECTS OF ANNULMENT OF MARRIAGE
The conjugal partnership shall be dissolved and
liquidated. The spouse shall lose his share of the net profits of the
partnership which shall be forfeited in favor of the common children if he contracted
the marriage in bad faith, or if none, to the children of the guilty spouse by
a previous marriage or to the innocent spouse.
EFFECT OF SEPARATION OF PROPERTIES
The
absolute community or conjugal partnership of gains shall be liquidated once
the separation of property has been decreed as stated under Article 137 of the
Family Code.
CASE DIGEST
FLORDELIZA CALPATURA FLORA, DOMINADOR CALPATURA and TOMAS
CALPATURA, JR., Heirs of TOMAS CALPATURA, SR., Petitioners, vs. ROBERTO,
ERLINDA, DANIEL, GLORIA, PATRICIO, JR. and EDNA, all surnamed PRADO and NARCISA
PRADO, Respondents.
G.R. No. 156879 January
20, 2004
FACTS: On December
19, 1959, Patricio Prado Sr. dies. Narcisa, Patricio’s wife, subsequently
married Bonifacio Calpatura. So, in order to support her minor children with
her first husband, Narcisa and her brother-in-law, Tomas Calpatura Sr.,
executed an agreement to purchase and sale, wherein Narcisa agreed to sell to
the latter the northern half portion of the property for the sum of Php 10,500.
On July 28, 1973, Narcisa executed a Deed of Absolute Sale in favor of
Tomas over the said property. Three years later, Flordeliza Calpatura, Tomas
daughter, built a two-storey duplex with firewall on the northern half portion
of the property. The respondents, who occupied the southern half portion of the
land, did not object to the construction.
On April 8, 1991, respondents filed a complaint for declaration of
nullity of sale and delivery of possession of the northern half portion of the
subject property against petitioners.
ISSUE: Whether or
not the sale of the one-half portion of the land is valid.
HELD: Yes! The sale
of the one-half portion of the land is valid.
Upon death of Patricio Padro. Sr., the one-half portion
of the land was automatically reserved to the surviving spouse because the property
is conjugal. While Patricio’s right to the other half, were transmitted upon
his death to his heirs by intestate succession which includes his widow
Narcisa, who is entitled to the same share and his six children.
WHEREFORE, the Decision of the Court of Appeals on
October 3, 2002, as well as the Resolution dated January 14, 2003 is PARTLY
AFFIRMED subject to the following MODIFICATIONS:
1) Narcisa Prado is entitled to 9/14 of the residential
land consisting of 552.20 square meters, more or less, situated at 19th Avenue,
Murphy, Quezon City and covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 71344;
2) the sale of the undivided one-half portion thereof by
Narcisa Prado in favor of Tomas Calpatura, Sr. is valid.
Furthermore, the case is REMANDED to the court of origin,
only for the purpose of determining the specific portion being conveyed in
favor of Tomas Calpatura, Sr. pursuant to the partition that will be agreed
upon by the respondents.
·
Family
Code of the Philippines Judge
Albano, Ed Vincent S. (2017)
Prepared
by:
Kath
Lyn B. Flores
College of Law
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Santa Cruz Laguna
Comments
Post a Comment